- Called to Bar:
- Practice areas:
- MA (Cantab) (Law) First Class, BCL (Oxon) First Class, (Princess Royal Scholar, Inner Temple)
Iain is ranked as a leading junior in the Civil Liberties & Human Rights area by both of the leading independent directories. Chambers UK 2013, reports that “his drafts are better than a polished production from many a more experienced barrister” and previously he was acclaimed as “stunningly good for one of his level of call”. In Legal 500 2012, Iain is regarded as “a real asset to any legal team”.
Iain is a member of the Attorney-General’s ‘C’ Panel.
Public Law and Human Rights
Iain has developed a wide-ranging public law and human rights practice, building upon his substantial academic involvement in this area. He advises and acts in areas including police powers, local government, education, prisoners’ rights, public procurement, social security and community care, commercial judicial review and environmental law.
Current and recent work
Iain has extensive experience of representing both claimants and defendants in the Administrative Court. Notable cases (in addition to those featured in other sections below) include:
- R (Rippington) v The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Ltd (ongoing)
Iain is currently acting as sole counsel for LOCOG in a claim raising issues of whether it performs public functions under the Equality Act 2010 and, if so, what is required by the public sector equality duty.
- R (Brown) v Canal & River Trust  EWHC 3133 (Admin)
Iain acted for the CRT in successfully resisting a judicial review challenge to guidance that addresses the issue of when its waterways can be used without having to purchase a home mooring.
- R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR) v Upper Tribunal  UKSC 28,  1 AC 663; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland  UKSC 29,  1 AC 710
Iain acted for JUSTICE in its intervention in these appeals concerning the scope of judicial review by the High Court or the Scottish Court of Session of unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal.
- R (One Search Direct) v City of York Council  EWHC 590 (Admin),  ACD 60
Iain acted for the claimant in this test case on the powers of local authorities to charge for access to property information.
- R (Faithfull) v Ipswich Crown Court  EWHC 2763 (Admin),  1 WLR 1636
Iain represented the claimant in a judicial review of the Crown Court’s failure to make a compensation order in favour of the victim of crime.
Iain has acted in many human rights matters (see also the police powers and foreign and defence policy sections below). Recent interesting cases include:
- Van Colle v United Kingdom (Application No. 7678/09, judgment of 13 November 2012)
Iain is acting for the applicants before the European Court of Human Rights in a case concerning the scope of the positive obligation to protect life under Article 2 ECHR. Iain previously appeared in the domestic proceedings: Van Colle v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police  UKHL 50,  1 AC 225.
- R (Sinclair Collis Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health  EWCA Civ 437,  QB 394
Iain acted for an Interested Party in a challenge to the ban on selling cigarettes through vending machines, based on Article 34 TFEU (free movement of goods) and Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the ECHR (right to property).
- Ahmed and others v Her Majesty’s Treasury  UKSC 2,  2 AC 534
Iain acted for JUSTICE in its intervention in the first appeals heard by the UK Supreme Court, successfully arguing that two Orders in Council which provided for the freezing of alleged terrorists’ assets should be quashed.
- R (SRM Global Master Fund LP and others) v HM Treasury  EWCA Civ 788
Iain acted for the former shareholders of Northern Rock in their judicial review challenge to legislation which nationalised the bank without paying them compensation. Iain also acted for the shareholders in the European Court of Human Rights: Grainger and others v United Kingdom (Application No. 34940/10, judgment of 10 July 2012).
- YL v Birmingham City Council and others  UKHL 27,  1 AC 95
Iain acted for Liberty, JUSTICE and the British Institute of Human Rights in the leading case on the definition of “public authority” under the Human Rights Act 1998.
Iain has a particular interest in cases concerning police powers and the right to protest. Notable cases include:
- R (Mengesha) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (ongoing)
Iain is acting for the claimant in this challenge to the power of the police to require individuals present at a demonstration to give their personal details and be photographed and filmed.
- Austin and others v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 14
Iain acted for the applicants in this case before the European Court of Human Rights concerning the compatibility with Article 5 ECHR of “kettling” of protestors and others by the police at the May Day 2001 demonstration in Oxford Circus.
- R (McClure and Moos) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis  EWCA Civ 12
Iain acted for the claimants in a high-profile judicial review challenge to the policing of the Climate Camp demonstration held during the G20 summit in London in April 2009, raising issues of whether the police containment (or “kettling”) of the Climate Camp and associated use of force were unlawful.
- R (Erenbilge) v Independent Police Complaints Commission (ongoing)
Iain is acting for the IPCC in a challenge to a decision relating to alleged excessive use of force by arresting officers.
- R (Morrison) v Independent Police Complaints Commission  EWHC 2589 (Admin)
Iain acted for the IPCC in this important judicial review claim raising issues concerning the investigative duty under Article 3 ECHR.
Foreign and Defence Policy
- Smith and others v Ministry of Defence (Supreme Court, February 2013)
Iain is acting for JUSTICE in its intervention in the latest case to consider the extra-territorial application of the ECHR. The issues before the Supreme Court include whether the English courts should adopt a wider approach following the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Skeini v UK.
- R (Alaa’ Nassif Jassim al Bazzouni) v Prime Minister and others  EWHC 2401 (Admin),  1 WLR 1389
Iain acted for the claimant in a successful challenge to Government guidance which unlawfully authorised UK personnel to condone the use of hooding by foreign states where deemed necessary for security reasons during arrest and transit.
- Al-Jedda v United Kingdom (2011) 53 EHRR 23
Iain acted for Liberty and JUSTICE in this case before the European Court of Human Rights concerning the interplay between the ECHR and other international law obligations.
Regulatory and Commercial
Iain regularly acts and advises in regulatory and commercial matters raising public law issues. He has acted for Ofcom, the General Medical Council and the Solicitors Regulation Authority in defending numerous judicial review challenges to their regulatory actions and is currently advising Ofgem in relation to its wide-ranging review of the energy retail market. He has also advised other regulators including Monitor, the Office of Fair Trading and the Financial Services Authority.
Notable cases in this area include:
- R (Satellite Entertainment Limited) v Office of Communications (2012)
Iain acted for Ofcom in a judicial review challenge to its decision to impose a £130,000 fine on a broadcaster for breaching the regulatory code of conduct. The case raised issues concerning apparent bias and Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the ECHR.
- R (Cordant Group plc) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills  EWHC 3442 (Admin)
Iain acted for the claimant in this judicial review of a decision to exclude travel and subsistence expenses when assessing compliance with the national minimum wage.
- R (Welsh Water Limited) v Ofwat  EWHC 3493 (Admin)
This was a judicial review of Ofwat’s decision to appoint another company to be the water and sewerage undertaker at a particular site. Iain acted for the claimant.
Iain’s practice encompasses all areas of employment law, including unfair and wrongful dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages and contractual matters. He regularly advises and represents both claimants and respondents in employment tribunal proceedings.
Iain has a particular interest in discrimination law and regularly appears in cases involving sex, race, age, disability, sexual orientation and religious discrimination. He acted with Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC for the Equality and Human Rights Commission in its intervention in the Court of Appeal in Bainbridge v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council and Surtees v Middlesbrough Borough Council  EWCA Civ 885,  ICR 133, one of the most significant equal pay cases for several years.
Iain is instructed with Dinah Rose QC to act for some 200 women who wish to compare their pay to that of men employed by the same local authority at different establishments. They were unsuccessful before the Scottish Court of Session in North v Dumfries & Galloway Council  CSIH 2 and are now pursuing an appeal to the UK Supreme Court, due to be heard in May 2013.
Iain also represented women who succeeded in a similar claim against another local authority in resisting an appeal to the Supreme Court in the case of City of Edinburgh v Wilkinson  CSIH 70. The case settled before the hearing.
Current and recent work
- USDAW v Woolworths and Ethel Austin (Employment Appeal Tribunal, hearing May 2013)
Iain represents the union in this important challenge to the compatibility of UK domestic legislation with the Collective Redundancies Directive. The claims arose following the insolvency of the high street chains Woolworths and Ethel Austin. Protective awards worth many millions of pounds were made to employees for failure to consult on proposed redundancies. The appeals relate to the substantial number of employees who were denied a protective award on the basis that they worked at stores with fewer than 20 employees.
- Aitchison v South Ayrshire Council (Supreme Court, 2013)
Iain acted for the claimants in resisting an appeal to the Supreme Court by the Council which concerned the proper construction and application of the statutory grievance procedure. The case settled shortly before the hearing.
- Hibbert v Apple Europe Limited (Appeal No UKEAT/0134/11, decision of 24 January 2012)
This was an appeal against a tribunal’s decision to proceed with a trial in the claimant’s absence.
- May v Invivodata
Iain acted for the respondent in a three day trial, successfully defending whistleblowing claims.
- Richards v Nationwide Building Society
Iain successfully defended a claim for age discrimination following an unsuccessful job application.
- Nassar v Notz Stucki and another
Iain represented the respondents in a high-profile four day trial on claims of unfair dismissal and sexual harassment valued at over £500,000.
- Sharpe v Britvic
Iain successfully argued at a Pre Hearing Review that various claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination should be struck out.
Professional disciplinary proceedings:
- Iain advises and acts for parties in disciplinary proceedings in a variety of tribunals, including police officers and teachers.
EU and Competition
Iain is regularly engaged in EU and competition law matters, in both commercial and regulatory contexts. He has acted for and advised numerous regulators including Ofgem, Ofcom, the Office of Fair Trading and Monitor. See further “Regulatory and Commercial” under Public Law, above.
Current and recent work
- R (Sinclair Collis Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health  EWCA Civ 437,  QB 394
Iain acted for an Interested Party in a challenge to the ban on selling cigarettes through vending machines, based on Article 34 TFEU (free movement of goods) and Article 1 of the First Protocol to the ECHR (right to property).
Iain has broad experience of commercial litigation, including areas such as civil fraud, financial services and entertainment law. He regularly advises and acts in disputes involving negligence, breach of contract and restitutionary remedies in a wide range of commercial settings.
Current and recent work
- Iain is currently acting for a Government Department in high value litigation against a former contractor.
- Lombard North Central plc v Hill
Iain successfully obtained strike out and summary judgment on claims worth over £250,000 for sums due under an aircraft mortgage.
- Lucas v Financial Services Authority
Iain acted for the FSA in successfully obtaining strike out and summary judgment on various claims, including on the basis that it was an abuse of process for the claimant to seek an adjudication on the validity of the FSA’s public law decision to cancel his permission other than on a reference to the Upper Tribunal.
- Pierce v Financial Services Authority and others
Iain acted for the FSA in successfully obtaining strike out and summary judgment on various claims brought against the FSA and the claimant’s former financial advisors.
- Caparo Industries plc and Caparo Vehicle Techologies Ltd v Gordon Murray Design Limited
Iain acted in a Chancery Division action concerning disputes arising out of a car design project.
- Dextra Solutions Ltd v Nsquared Creations Ltd and another
Iain successfully represented the claimant in a number of claims arising from a mobile phone distribution agreement.
- CBR (Wakefield) Limited and others v Puccino’s Limited
Iain appeared in a very substantial High Court action arising out of a large-scale construction and franchising project, which raised issues including estoppel, waiver, variation of contractual terms, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and conspiracy (settled during six-week trial).
Iain has appeared and advised in a number of sports cases covering a range of contractual and regulatory sporting disputes, and has also advised on the exploitation of media rights to sporting events.
Current and recent work
- BBC Worldwide v UK Athletics
Iain acted for UK Athletics in a dispute concerning the international broadcast rights to athletics events held in the UK.
- Iain has advised The Football League on issues concerning club ownership and The League’s Fit and Proper Person test, in the wake of Silvio Briatore’s ban from Formula One by the FIA and questions as to the ownership of Notts County and Leeds United.
- Iain advised The Football Association on a personal injury claim brought by a retired player.
Other relevant experience
Other legal experience:
Member of Lawyers for LIBERTY, ALBA, HRLA, ELBA and ELA.
As a student, Iain gained considerable experience of mooting. He won two competitions at Cambridge and represented the University in the English Speaking Union national competition, reaching the semi-finals. During his year at Bar School, he was a finalist in the Inner Temple Lawson Mooting Competition. Iain has also judged moots.
After leaving university, Iain worked for a year as a Research Assistant in the Public Law Team at the Law Commission. He wrote a Discussion Paper on “Monetary Remedies in Public Law”, which was published by the Commission in 2004. It was later cited by Lord Bingham in the House of Lords in Watkins v Home Office  UKHL 17,  2 AC 395. Iain’s work in this field provided the foundations for a full Law Commission project.
While at Bar School, Iain was a part-time tutor at King’s College, London, where he taught Public Law to undergraduates.
Scholarships and Prizes:
Iain’s academic scholarships and prizes include:
- Eldon Law Scholarship (University of Oxford, 2005; awarded to the most promising Oxford graduate intending to practise at the Bar)
- Overall grade of Outstanding and Worshipful Company of Arbitrators Prize for Civil Law and EC Competition Law (Inns of Court School of Law, 2005)
- Prize for BVC Results (Inner Temple, 2005)
- Princess Royal Scholarship (Inner Temple, 2004)
- College Prize (Magdalen College, Oxford, 2003)
- Arts and Humanities Research Board Award for Postgraduate Study (2002)
- Lucas-Smith Memorial Prize (Queens’ College, Cambridge, 2002)
- Foundation Scholarship (Queens’ College, Cambridge, 2001)
- Squire Law Scholarship (University of Cambridge, 2000)
- College Exhibition (Queens’ College, Cambridge, 2000)
Iain is the co-author of the chapter on equal pay in the Tolley’s Discrimination in Employment Handbook (first edition 2008; second edition 2011) and of the chapters on the Human Rights Act 1998 and principles of interpretation in Lester, Pannick and Herberg: Human Rights Law and Practice (published in April 2009).
Iain has published work in a wide range of academic journals. Previous articles include:
- ‘Judicial Review in an Age of Austerity: Costs and Funding’  JR 249
- 'Public Law Liability – the End of the Road (For Now)' (2011) 127 LQR 512
- 'Sex discrimination and the material factor defence under the Equal Pay Act 1970 and the Equality Act 2010’  ILJ 264
- 'Judicial Review of the Crown Court and Section 29(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1981'  JR 180
- ‘Negligence Liability for Failing to Prevent Crime – the Human Rights Dimension’  CLJ 239
- ‘Judicial Independence: Privy Council Divided’ (2008) 124 LQR 185
- ‘Beyond Equal Pay?’  ILJ 119
- ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations: Striking the Right Balance?’ (2005) 121 LQR 300
- ‘Tracing the Single Source: Choice of Comparators in Equal Pay Claims’  ILJ 338
- ‘Public Law Liability – a Common Law Solution?’  CLJ 543
- ‘Public Law Liability – the Human Rights Act and Beyond’  CLJ 8
- ‘Note on R (National Association of Health Stores) v Department of Health’  JR 232
- ‘Judging judicial inquiries’  PL 738
VAT registration number: 888124490